|Mike Pintek was WKBO's News
Director when a near meltdown of The Three Mile Island Nuclear plant occurred.
On March 28, 1979, while out in his Traffic Watch vehicle, Captain Dave
Edwards observed irregularities with one of the TMI cooling towers. He
immediately made some phone calls, setting into motion the drama that became
America's worst nuclear accident. Dave's discovery is part of the congressional
record of the TMI disaster. Mike Pintek, Joe Wambach and the news department
went into emergency mode and provided updates around the clock. WKBO won
numerous awards for its coverage of TMI.
Mike Pintek passed away on
September 12, 2018. Mike battled pancreatic camce since May 2017. Mike,
along with Captain Dave, broke the 3 Mile Island story on WKBO on March
28, 1979, He went to KDKA, Pittsburg, in 1982. For over 30 years he hosted
the Mike Pintek Show on KDKA. He was 65.
These picture appeared
in the April 15, 1979 issue of the Radio News Hotline
|ND Mike Pintek at work in
newsroom, with LPB console, gates machines,
ampex deck and GE two-way
unit nearby. Note 'Touch-A-Matic' automatic
phone dialer near console.
|WKBO news vehicles are
78 camaros with scanners and two-ways. "Traffic Watch" unit is 78 Chevette.
All are bright yellow.
|WKBO Co-Anchor Michelle
Lefever working at alternate newsroom work station.
Mike also anchored news at WASH
in Washington D.C. Mike spent over 30 years at KDKA in Pittsburgh.
"It was scary all around. It was an emotional rollercoaster."
Three Mile Island has left a permanent impact on Pennsylvania, and the
nation. Coverage of that far-reaching story presented complex problems
for local broadcasters in Harrisburg.
In this, the final part of a series, ND Mike Pintek of WKBO sums up what
happened and how you can prepare for a possible nuclear emergency
in your coverage area:
It's not like a fire. you go down to a fire and you get on your two-way
radio and say -- "yes, the buildings on fire... I can see flames leaping
throught the window.".
Well, you go down to (Three Mile) Island and it just sits there.
you really can't see anything, you have to accept everything the officials
I think the only way you can prepare for a disaster of this sort is the
way you prepare for any other disaster. You have your telephone numbers
You could have a science editor available (either someone on your staff,
or a qualified outsider from a local college).
Another problem is one of rumors. And I think in a situation like this
you have to remain calm ... even though your own life is in danger.
You can't alarm people.
On Wednesday morning when the problem started ... the state didn't have
any monitoring equipment to go out and check on the radiation levels. So,
everybody had to depend on the power company's statements.
Turns out the legislature had not appropriated money to buy equipment.
(Met Ed) said -- everything's fine, and the state said the levels are low.
Well, you turn around and talk to a scientist and he says the levels
are high and could cause cancer.
His opinion is just as valid as the company's. Then you have the NRC (Nuclear
Regulatory Commission) coming in.
By this time, you have four or five sources of information and they're
conflicting with each other.
You have a problem then ... do I report all of these things, or what do
Well ... you don't have much of a choice, because you don't know from your
own experience or education which is right or wrong.
I think had the power company come out immediately and said-- "We have
a serious problem here" -- people would not have gotten as excited as they
It was when the governor realized (and we in the mediahad already realized)
that there was conflicting information, he really started to worry.
On Friday, when people really started to get hysterical, we even
had the General Manager here ... and I had him here answering phones.
When the wire service was sending out bulletins right and left, we had
stations from all over the country calling us. The phones were jammed because
of the local calls and the phone company was at wits end trying to keep
the lines clear.
Stations wanted beepers and we had to hang up on them. I said -- I will
not tie up that newsline with calls from services from stations in San
Francisco, Los Angeles and so forth.
I think at one point somebody said to me -- "ABC News is on the line" --
and I said "I can't talk to them".
The listeners came first.
think anybody in this area really knew how to handle this story. Nobody
knew what to do. We've been through a couple of floods and we've had other
It's a 20th Century nightmare! Radiation is something you can't see, you
can't feel, you can't smell ... and you don't know what it's going to do
A majority of people here at the station live within five-miles of the
plant so we had a personal stake in things. And, what do you do?
One of the big problems here was, I don't think there was ever a concerted
drive to draw up evacuation plans in the event of a disaster at the nuclear
That's one of the good things about this incident because those plans are
drawn up now. And if it ever happens again ... God forbid ... they'll be
"This was radio's story
from the beginning. The developments were breaking so fast that radio was
the only medium that could handle it."
I was talking to a friend of mine at KDKA/Pittsburgh and he said -- "I
love this excitement".
Well, so do I. I have always loved the excitement of a good story. But
the problem is that I live here. I think the newsman has to be a
This was radio's story from the beginning. The developments were breaking
so fast that radio was the only medium that could handle it. We broke normal
programming, and I know that all the other stations in the area did.
I found it a very difficult story to cover. I don't know what I
would have done if this had been a one-person news operation.
We were fortunate to have four full-time people ... but that wasn't enough.
It would have been great to have twice or three-times that many. Then you
could have deployed them.